User talk:Tonyb1961
Onix Audio
[edit]Please read, at absolute minimum, Referencing For Beginners and the external links policy, the first sentence of which reads "Wikipedia articles may include links to web pages outside Wikipedia (external links), but they should not normally be placed in the body of an article." NewEnglandYankee (talk) 18:07, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, Tonyb1961. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Onix Audio, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 01:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 02:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
January 2020
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 03:13, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 03:14, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 03:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Tonyb1961 reported by User:Moonythedwarf (Result: ). Thank you. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 03:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to the teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hello! Tonyb1961,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!
|
--MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 04:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
January 2020
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 04:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)- I've unblocked you per the conclusion reached here. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 13:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)